EVIDENCE IN LEGAL PRACTICE

June 16, 2025 · 12:46 amImmigrationCriminal
EVIDENCE IN LEGAL PRACTICE

Evidence in legal practice is a necessary tool to prove your case. In any legal proceeding, whether it’s an immigration application, an administrative tribunal, or a court case, your success largely depends on the strength of your evidence. Evidence can take many forms: your own testimony, the testimony of witnesses, or documents supporting your claims.

But how do you determine whether the evidence you provide will be accepted by an immigration officer, tribunal adjudicator, or judge? The key questions to ask are:

  1. Is the evidence relevant to the matter at hand?
  2. Is it probative—meaning, does it help prove your case?

Choosing the Right Evidence

When preparing your case, the least preferred type of evidence is hearsay, that is, statements or information obtained second-hand, often described as rumors. However, unlike in strict court proceedings, hearsay may sometimes be admissible in immigration and administrative hearings, especially if it meets specific exceptions or if there is no alternative evidence available. Ultimately, it is up to the decision-maker to assess whether the hearsay is trustworthy and credible.

When Is Hearsay Acceptable?

Certain types of hearsay are more likely to be accepted if they fall within recognized exceptions, such as:

  • Testimony given in formal court or proceedings where the witness was subject to cross-examination;
  • Admissions made to an official or court, such as prior statements made to immigration officers during an initial examination;
  • Situations where obtaining direct evidence is impossible, but the hearsay can be deemed reliable;
  • Declarations against interest, where the statement goes against the declarant’s own interest;
  • Business records, which are kept in the regular course of business;
  • Past recollections recorded, such as police officers referring to notes made at the time of an incident;
  • Statements describing past events with significant emotional or physical impact on the declarant;
  • Statements about the declarant’s physical, mental, or emotional state at the time of the event;
  • Dying declarations;
  • Official records and statements.

Hearsay in Refugee and Immigration Proceedings

In refugee hearings and other immigration-related cases, hearsay is more commonly accepted. For example, testimonies from friends or professionals may be admitted, though tribunals will always take steps to carefully assess the credibility of such statements.

In our practice, we often make use of opinion evidence, expert insights provided by professionals with specialized knowledge in relevant fields. For instance, we frequently collaborate with professors from Toronto universities to obtain expert opinions on political situations, human rights conditions, and systemic risks in our clients’ countries of origin. These expert statements significantly strengthen refugee claims and other immigration cases.

Building a Strong Case

Evidence in legal practice is the first thing that comes in mind when preparing for your matter in court or tribunal. For all types of immigration cases, whether refugee claims, sponsorship applications, or applications based on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, it is crucial to thoroughly examine every piece of evidence available to the client.

At our office, we’ve developed a systematic approach. We encourage clients to share every detail about their background, including their biography, education, work history, personal experiences, and even future aspirations. This comprehensive understanding allows us to identify all possible evidence that can support their application or claim.

Ultimately, the right evidence can be the deciding factor between success and failure in immigration proceedings. The goal is always to present credible, relevant, and persuasive evidence that speaks to the heart of the case.

What evidence matters most at an immigration hearing?

The Refugee Protection Division and the Immigration Appeal Division are not bound by the technical rules of evidence that apply in court. Under sections 170(g) and (h) and 175(1)(b) and (c) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, they can receive any evidence and base a decision on what they consider credible or trustworthy in the circumstances. That is why hearsay, letters and indirect documents can count. It also means the member weighs every piece, so a document that is admitted is not automatically believed.

Type of evidenceExamplesWhat it does
TestimonyYour own account and witnessesThe member decides whether it is credible and consistent
DocumentsIdentity, relationship, employment and medical recordsCorroborates the testimony
Country conditionsReports on the country you would return toCentral in refugee claims
Expert opinionMedical, psychological or country expertsExplains an issue outside ordinary knowledge

Two refugee claims proved without direct documents

Angelina Shuster described these cases in an earlier article, which is now part of this one:

Immigration law differs from any other law, criminal or civil. It has its own rules. If, for example, you were brought to criminal justice, you would not be able to present hearsay evidence (you cannot bring something as a true statement if it is not yours), but in immigration cases you can. Let’s say, you don’t have any material evidence of belongings to a particular political group to present to an adjudicator at your refugee hearing. Can you still prove your case? Yes, you can. You would be allowed to show the tribunal letters from people who know you and the situation; you can also present photographs which are not directly connected to the fact you want to prove, a statement from friends or even people who were in similar circumstances. I recall one case when we successfully proved the case of a refugee claimant who did not have a direct documentary evidence to show that he firstly, was Jewish and secondly that he belonged to a group of business people who were targeted by corrupted elements. When preparing his case we asked him to bring all documents he had in his place and he brought a business card of a theater director who happened to hide our client from bandits. The adjudicator accepted the card as evidence after our client explained how two were connected. Our client also proved his Jewish nationality by showing a photograph of his relative’s grave in St. Petersburg. The name on the grave was illegible, but our client explained in details why he has the photograph in his possession and who was the relative. The adjudicator combined everything, the client’s straightforward testimony, the photograph and previous written history of his life. In legal world it is called a “totality of evidence”. In another case, we presented our client’s involvement in a political activity in Azerbaijan, and his paintings where he reflected struggle of people in a subtle metaphorical manner, as evidence. The adjudicator accepted the paintings as corroborative evidence to our client’s testimony. So, the inference is that you can bring anything you have to prove your case, but you should remember that the evidence and your story must create a plausible (believable) case.

The 10-day disclosure rule at the RPD

At the Refugee Protection Division, every document a party wants to use has to reach the other party and the Division at least 10 days before the hearing, or 5 days for a document that answers one provided by someone else (RPD Rules, rule 34(3)). A document that was not disclosed in time cannot be used at the hearing unless the Division allows it, and in deciding that it looks at the document's relevance and probative value, any new evidence it brings, and whether it could reasonably have been provided on time (rule 36). Documents in a language other than English or French need a translation and a declaration signed by the translator that names the language and confirms the translation is correct (rule 32). Other divisions set their own time limits, and the Immigration Appeal Division counts from the date the appeal record is received.

Each document has to answer the legal question

Files are lost less often for lack of documents than for documents that do not address what has to be decided. In a refugee claim the questions are risk on return, state protection and whether there is a safe place elsewhere in the country. In a sponsorship appeal it is whether the relationship is genuine. In a removal or criminal inadmissibility matter it is the ground of inadmissibility and any humanitarian factors. A document belongs in the file when it answers one of those questions.

Testimony and documents are compared

Members read the evidence against the person's own earlier statements: application forms, the Basis of Claim, notes taken at the port of entry and earlier applications. A contradiction on dates or facts does more damage than a missing document, and one that looks deliberate can be treated as misrepresentation. Before the hearing the whole record should be read side by side, and a genuine discrepancy explained by the person, with a document where possible, before the member raises it. What happens on the day itself is set out in our article on what happens at a refugee hearing.

Angelina Shuster is a licensed paralegal and prepares and presents evidence before the Immigration and Refugee Board on refugee claims, immigration appeals and admissibility hearings. What a case needs can be reviewed through a free assessment.

This article is general information, not legal advice.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Can hearsay be used as evidence at an immigration hearing?

Yes. The Refugee Protection Division and the Immigration Appeal Division are not bound by the legal or technical rules of evidence and can rely on any evidence they consider credible or trustworthy in the circumstances. The member still decides how much weight it deserves.

How early must evidence be disclosed for a refugee hearing?

At least 10 days before the hearing, or 5 days for a document responding to one from another party, under rule 34(3) of the RPD Rules. A late document can be used only if the Division allows it under rule 36.

Do documents in another language need to be translated?

Yes. Under rule 32 of the RPD Rules, a document that is not in English or French needs a translation and a declaration signed by the translator naming the language and confirming that the translation is correct.

What kind of evidence do I need for a refugee claim?

A refugee claim relies on the Basis of Claim narrative, identity documents, evidence supporting the personal account and objective reports on conditions in the country. Evidence that is consistent and disclosed before the deadline carries the most weight with the member.

Angelina Shuster — Licensed Paralegal, Karb Law
Written by

Angelina Shuster

Licensed Paralegal · Law Society of Ontario

Angelina Shuster is a paralegal licensed by the Law Society of Ontario with 25 years of experience in Canada. Based at Karb Law’s office in Richmond Hill, she represents clients across Ontario and in immigration matters throughout Canada, and has helped thousands of people with immigration and legal matters: refugee claims, appeals, admissibility and detention reviews before the Immigration and Refugee Board, and summary-conviction criminal matters.

About Angelina Shuster & her credentials →
Keep Reading

Related Articles

Working in Canada

Working in Canada

Our immigration system is designed in a way as to provide various options for those specialists who want to work in Canada under temporary work ...

Read More
December 7, 2020

Request a Consultation

Fill out the form below and our legal team will get back to you shortly.

Contact us

Google Google Rating
4.7★★★★★Based on 36 reviews
Google
Google Rating
4.7★★★★★
Based on 36 reviews