In any legal proceeding, whether it’s an immigration application, an administrative tribunal, or a court case, your success largely depends on the strength of your evidence. Evidence can take many forms: your own testimony, the testimony of witnesses, or documents supporting your claims.
But how do you determine whether the evidence you provide will be accepted by an immigration officer, tribunal adjudicator, or judge? The key questions to ask are:
- Is the evidence relevant to the matter at hand?
- Is it probative—meaning, does it help prove your case?
Choosing the Right Evidence
When preparing your case, the least preferred type of evidence is hearsay, that is, statements or information obtained second-hand, often described as rumors. However, unlike in strict court proceedings, hearsay may sometimes be admissible in immigration and administrative hearings, especially if it meets specific exceptions or if there is no alternative evidence available. Ultimately, it is up to the decision-maker to assess whether the hearsay is trustworthy and credible.
When Is Hearsay Acceptable?
Certain types of hearsay are more likely to be accepted if they fall within recognized exceptions, such as:
- Testimony given in formal court or proceedings where the witness was subject to cross-examination;
- Admissions made to an official or court, such as prior statements made to immigration officers during an initial examination;
- Situations where obtaining direct evidence is impossible, but the hearsay can be deemed reliable;
- Declarations against interest, where the statement goes against the declarant’s own interest;
- Business records, which are kept in the regular course of business;
- Past recollections recorded, such as police officers referring to notes made at the time of an incident;
- Statements describing past events with significant emotional or physical impact on the declarant;
- Statements about the declarant’s physical, mental, or emotional state at the time of the event;
- Dying declarations;
- Official records and statements.
Hearsay in Refugee and Immigration Proceedings
In refugee hearings and other immigration-related cases, hearsay is more commonly accepted. For example, testimonies from friends or professionals may be admitted, though tribunals will always take steps to carefully assess the credibility of such statements.
In our practice, we often make use of opinion evidence, expert insights provided by professionals with specialized knowledge in relevant fields. For instance, we frequently collaborate with professors from Toronto universities to obtain expert opinions on political situations, human rights conditions, and systemic risks in our clients’ countries of origin. These expert statements significantly strengthen refugee claims and other immigration cases.
Building a Strong Case
For all types of immigration cases, whether refugee claims, sponsorship applications, or applications based on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, it is crucial to thoroughly examine every piece of evidence available to the client.
At our office, we’ve developed a systematic approach. We encourage clients to share every detail about their background, including their biography, education, work history, personal experiences, and even future aspirations. This comprehensive understanding allows us to identify all possible evidence that can support their application or claim.
Ultimately, the right evidence can be the deciding factor between success and failure in immigration proceedings. The goal is always to present credible, relevant, and persuasive evidence that speaks to the heart of the case.