IRCC or a visa office
A procedural fairness letter states the concern and a date to answer in writing.
IRPA s.40(1)(a)Our legal team assists
A wrong or missing answer on an immigration form can bring a five-year inadmissibility. When the allegation goes to the Immigration Division or the Immigration Appeal Division, Angelina Shuster, a paralegal licensed by the Law Society of Ontario, can represent you there.
Tell us who raised the allegation and the date on the letter. We reply with the forum and the time left.
The same section 40 finding can be made in three places. Where yours sits decides who may act for you.
A procedural fairness letter states the concern and a date to answer in writing.
IRPA s.40(1)(a)Our legal team assistsA section 44 report is referred for a hearing. The Minister must prove the allegation.
IRPA s.44 · IRBParalegal may representA permanent resident ordered removed, or a sponsor whose spouse, partner or child was refused, can ask the IAD to review the finding.
IRPA s.63 · s.67Paralegal may represent
Section 64(3) narrows the sponsor’s appeal right when the refusal rests on misrepresentation.
Rule 16 of the IAD Rules, 2022 sets the appeal deadlines. Section 40 of the Act sets how long the inadmissibility lasts.
A permanent resident ordered removed for misrepresentation files the notice of appeal within 30 days of receiving the order.
IRPA s.63(3) · Rule 16(b)The sponsor files within 30 days of receiving the refusal and written reasons.
IRPA s.64(3) · Rule 16(a)From the final refusal abroad, or from enforcement of a removal order in Canada. No permanent residence application meanwhile.
IRPA s.40(2)(a) · s.40(3)
A paralegal licensed by the Law Society of Ontario, who appears before the Immigration and Refugee Board.
“I was greatly impressed by the efficiency with which Angelina handled our immigration case. All of our concerns, however minor, were promptly addressed by her. In addition to her efficiency she provided us with personal support at a time when it was most needed, the nerve-wracking days before the scheduled interview with the Immigration Officials. She reassured us and alleviated our fears, rational as well as irrational.”
Misrepresentation turns on what was said, when, and by whom.

No. Section 40(1)(a) covers direct or indirect misrepresentation or withholding of a material fact that induces or could induce an error in the administration of the Act. The text of the section does not mention intent.
The word “indirectly” in section 40 means an applicant can be found inadmissible for an error made by someone else on their file.
Yes. Law Society of Ontario By-Law 4 lets a licensed paralegal appear before federal tribunals, and the Immigration Division is part of the Immigration and Refugee Board.
Yes. Under section 67(1)(c) the IAD may allow an appeal on humanitarian and compassionate grounds, taking into account the best interests of a child directly affected.
This page is general information about misrepresentation under Canadian immigration law and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create a paralegal-client relationship. Our legal team assists with the full range of your matter, including applications filed with IRCC.
Get a free assessmentFill out the form below and our legal team will get back to you shortly.