The Canadian Courts, Judges, Lawyers and Immigration Hearings
In order to understand how legal system works in Canada, one has to familirize themselves with Canadian courts structure. Some of my colleagues who exclusively ...
Read MoreMany spousal, common-law and conjugal partner sponsorships are refused because the couple filed on their own and sent the papers they happened to have, rather than the proof an officer looks for. A common belief is that marrying a Canadian leads straight to permanent residence. It does not: the couple has to show the relationship, and the officer decides only on what is in the file.
When the partner applied from outside Canada, the sponsor can usually appeal the refusal to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board. That appeal is a fresh hearing. A Member listens to both partners, accepts evidence the officer never received and makes a new decision under section 67(1) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA): the refusal was wrong in law or fact, natural justice was not observed, or humanitarian grounds justify special relief.
The officer’s letter cites a provision. That provision, not the general feeling of the refusal, sets what the appeal has to prove.
| The letter says | Provision | What the appeal file needs |
|---|---|---|
| The relationship is not genuine | IRPR s.4(1)(b) | A shared life traced across time: messages from different years, dated visits, money sent between you, people who know you as a couple. |
| It was entered into mainly to gain status | IRPR s.4(1)(a) | How the relationship started and why the two of you decided to marry, with plans that would stand even without immigration. |
| The partner was not examined when the sponsor immigrated | IRPR s.117(9)(d) | The sponsor’s landing papers and forms, to test whether the partner really went undeclared. If the exclusion holds, s.65 removes humanitarian relief. |
| Misrepresentation | IRPA s.40, s.64(3) | The exact statement the officer relied on, when it was made, and whether it could have changed the decision. A spouse or partner keeps the appeal right. |
| The sponsor is barred | IRPR s.133 | Records that the bar no longer applies, for example a discharged bankruptcy or an earlier undertaking that has been repaid. |
IRPA s.63(1) gives the appeal to the person who filed the sponsorship. Section 64 lists the refusals no appeal can reach.
Each step starts a new count. Keep the envelope, email or portal notice that shows when the refusal arrived.
The first version of this article said documents go in 20 days before the hearing. That timing came from the IAD rules replaced in 2022; today the count starts from the appeal record.
Couples apart for years rarely have a joint lease or a big wedding album. A Member can accept other records, provided they explain the gap.

Each partner answers separately. Differences between the two accounts, or between an account and the file, are where Minister’s counsel focuses.
Yes. LSO By-Law 4 lets a licensed paralegal appear before a tribunal created under federal legislation, and the IAD is a division of the Immigration and Refugee Board.
Both routes exist. A new application starts again before an officer; an appeal keeps the original file and lets both partners testify. The refusal ground and the evidence available now decide which one fits.
An officer then completes the processing of the partner’s application. The IAD itself does not issue a visa.
The sponsor may ask the Federal Court for leave to review the decision under IRPA s.72. The Federal Court is outside a paralegal’s scope.
General information only: this post explains how IAD sponsorship appeals work and is not legal advice for any one couple. A signed retainer, not reading a page, starts a paralegal-client relationship.
At the free assessment, Angelina Shuster reads the refusal letter with you, checks whether the 30 days are still running and tells you which line of the table above the appeal turns on; she is the licensed paralegal who then speaks for the sponsor at the hearing, in English or Russian. Our legal team assists with the full range of your matter, including applications filed with IRCC.
In order to understand how legal system works in Canada, one has to familirize themselves with Canadian courts structure. Some of my colleagues who exclusively ...
Read MoreJudges and Adjudicators Everyone knows that judges are the people who decide cases in court, but what that actually looks like can vary greatly depending ...
Read MoreThe role of counsel in legal proceedings is important if a litigant or immigration appellant wants to present their case the best way possible. When ...
Read MoreFill out the form below and our legal team will get back to you shortly.